Lab 25: Real-World Datasets and Challenges
Core Component: This lab explores how Bonsai v3 addresses the challenges of working with real-world genetic datasets, which often involve missing data, population-specific patterns, and various quality issues. Understanding these challenges and how to overcome them is essential for applying computational genetic genealogy techniques in practical scenarios.
The Reality Gap in Genetic Genealogy
From Theory to Practice
While previous labs have focused on the theoretical foundations and algorithmic approaches of computational genetic genealogy, this lab addresses the "reality gap"—the set of challenges that emerge when applying these methods to real-world data:
Key Real-World Challenges
- Data Quality and Completeness: Missing, sparse, or variable-quality genetic data
- Population Diversity: Different genetic patterns across diverse human populations
- Testing Platform Differences: Variations in SNP coverage, phasing quality, and analysis methods
- Privacy and Ethical Constraints: Limitations on data access and usage
- Scale Challenges: Handling large datasets with thousands or millions of individuals
Bonsai v3 incorporates numerous adaptations to address these real-world challenges, enabling more robust performance across diverse scenarios and datasets.
Data Quality and Completeness
Handling Imperfect Data
Real-world genetic genealogy datasets rarely have the completeness and quality assumed by theoretical models. Bonsai v3 implements several strategies to handle these imperfections:
Common Data Quality Issues
Issue | Impact | Bonsai's Approach |
---|---|---|
Missing Data | Incomplete SNP coverage leads to underestimated IBD sharing | Normalization algorithms that adjust for coverage gaps |
Phasing Errors | Incorrect assignment of variants to paternal/maternal chromosomes | Robust likelihood models that account for phase uncertainty |
Genotyping Errors | Incorrect variant calls affecting IBD detection | Statistical filters to identify and handle potential errors |
Inconsistent Coverage | Variable SNP density across the genome | Region-specific calibration and weighting |
Sample Contamination | DNA from multiple individuals mixed in a single sample | Anomaly detection to flag potentially contaminated samples |
Adjusting for Missing Data
# Pseudocode for coverage-aware IBD normalization def normalize_ibd_for_coverage(observed_ibd, coverage_fraction): """ Adjust observed IBD sharing to account for incomplete coverage. Args: observed_ibd: Observed IBD sharing in cM coverage_fraction: Fraction of the genome with adequate coverage Returns: Normalized IBD estimate """ if coverage_fraction < MIN_COVERAGE_THRESHOLD: # Too little coverage for reliable normalization return observed_ibd, "low_confidence" # Simple linear normalization normalized_ibd = observed_ibd / coverage_fraction # Apply confidence rating based on coverage if coverage_fraction > 0.9: confidence = "high" elif coverage_fraction > 0.7: confidence = "medium" else: confidence = "low" return normalized_ibd, confidence
Partial Data Strategies
Bonsai implements several approaches for working with partial or incomplete data:
- Graceful Degradation: Algorithms that continue to function with reduced accuracy as data quality decreases
- Confidence Calibration: Adjusting confidence scores based on data completeness
- Imputation Techniques: Filling in missing data using population references where appropriate
- Feature Weighting: Giving more weight to high-quality data regions in relationship inference
Population-Specific Patterns
Adapting to Human Genetic Diversity
Human populations have different genetic histories and characteristics that affect genetic genealogy analysis. Bonsai v3 accounts for these population-specific patterns:
Key Population Considerations
- Recombination Rate Variation: Different populations show different patterns of genetic recombination
- Runs of Homozygosity (ROH): Endogamous populations have more and longer ROH regions
- Demographic History: Population bottlenecks and expansions affect genetic diversity
- Admixture Patterns: Mixed ancestry creates complex IBD patterns
- Reference Bias: Most genetic references are skewed toward European populations
Population-Aware Calibration
Bonsai v3 includes population-specific calibration for several key parameters:
- Recombination Maps: Population-specific genetic maps for more accurate genetic distance calculation
- IBD Detection Thresholds: Adjusted thresholds for populations with different background IBD patterns
- Relationship Likelihood Models: Population-specific parameters for relationship inference
- Endogamy Correction: Population-specific adjustment factors for endogamous groups
Implementation Approaches
Several implementation strategies enable effective handling of population diversity:
- Population Inference: Automatically detecting population background from genetic data
- Adaptive Parameters: Adjusting algorithm parameters based on detected population
- Multi-Reference Models: Using multiple population references for improved accuracy
- Admixture-Aware Analysis: Handling segments from different ancestral populations appropriately
Example: Endogamy Adjustment by Population
Population Group | Endogamy Factor | Impact on Relationship Inference |
---|---|---|
Ashkenazi Jewish | 1.5 - 2.0 | Significant adjustment needed; relationships often appear closer than genealogical distance |
Finnish | 1.2 - 1.4 | Moderate adjustment needed, especially for distant relationships |
Puerto Rican | 1.1 - 1.3 | Slight adjustment needed, primarily for distant relationships |
Northern European | 1.0 - 1.1 | Minimal adjustment needed for most relationships |
Testing Platform Differences
Integrating Data from Multiple Sources
Real-world genetic genealogy often involves integrating data from multiple testing platforms, each with different characteristics. Bonsai v3 addresses these platform differences:
Major Testing Platform Variations
- SNP Coverage: Different tests analyze different subsets of SNPs
- Chip Versions: Testing companies frequently update their genotyping arrays
- Analysis Algorithms: Different companies use different algorithms for IBD detection
- Reporting Formats: Data formats and segment reporting criteria vary
- Reference Populations: Different platforms use different reference populations
Cross-Platform Integration Approaches
Bonsai implements several strategies for effective cross-platform integration:
- Common SNP Analysis: Focusing analysis on SNPs common to all platforms
- Platform-Specific Calibration: Adjusting expectations based on known platform characteristics
- Format Normalization: Converting data from different sources to a consistent internal format
- Confidence Adjustment: Modifying confidence scores based on platform compatibility
Platform Compatibility Matrix
Bonsai maintains a compatibility matrix for common testing platforms, informing its cross-platform integration strategies:
- High Compatibility: Platforms with similar SNP sets and analysis methods
- Moderate Compatibility: Platforms with partial SNP overlap but different analysis methods
- Low Compatibility: Platforms with minimal SNP overlap or fundamentally different approaches
This matrix helps Bonsai adjust its algorithms and confidence reporting when working with mixed-platform data.
Privacy and Ethical Considerations
Responsible Genetic Genealogy
Working with real-world genetic data involves navigating important privacy and ethical considerations. Bonsai v3 incorporates several features to support responsible use:
Key Privacy and Ethical Challenges
- Sensitive Relationship Discovery: Uncovering previously unknown family connections
- Data Access Controls: Managing who can access genetic relationship information
- Informed Consent: Ensuring participants understand how their data will be used
- Secondary Discoveries: Handling incidental findings like health-related information
- Re-identification Risk: Protecting against identification of individuals from anonymized data
Relationship Sensitivity Classification
Bonsai implements a classification system for relationship sensitivity:
Sensitivity Level | Relationship Types | Handling Approach |
---|---|---|
High Sensitivity | Parent-child misattributions, evidence of incest | Restricted access, additional verification required, careful reporting |
Moderate Sensitivity | Unknown siblings, unexpected close relatives | Access controls, verification recommended, measured reporting |
Standard Sensitivity | Expected relationships, distant cousins | Standard access controls, normal reporting |
Privacy-Preserving Features
Bonsai implements several privacy-preserving features:
- Data Minimization: Using only the data necessary for relationship inference
- Access Controls: Supporting granular permissions for relationship visibility
- Anonymization Options: Allowing identity redaction while preserving relationship structure
- Consent-Based Processing: Respecting user preferences for data usage
Scale Challenges in Real-World Applications
Handling Large-Scale Analyses
Real-world genetic genealogy applications often involve large datasets with thousands or millions of individuals. Bonsai v3 includes specialized optimizations for large-scale analyses:
Key Scale Challenges
- Computational Complexity: Many key algorithms have quadratic or worse complexity
- Memory Constraints: Large datasets can exceed available memory
- Pairwise Comparison Explosion: The number of potential relationships grows quadratically
- Visualization Complexity: Large pedigrees become difficult to comprehend
- Consistency Maintenance: Ensuring biological consistency becomes harder at scale
Bonsai's Scale Optimizations
Several key optimizations enable Bonsai to handle large-scale analyses:
- Hierarchical Processing: Multi-level approaches that progressively refine analyses
- Filtering Strategies: Intelligent pre-filtering to focus on likely relationships
- Chunking and Batching: Processing data in manageable chunks
- Parallelization: Distributing workloads across multiple processors
- Incremental Updates: Efficiently incorporating new data without full recomputation
Hierarchical IBD Analysis
# Pseudocode for hierarchical IBD analysis def hierarchical_ibd_analysis(individuals, max_group_size=1000): """ Process large datasets using a hierarchical approach. Args: individuals: List of all individuals to analyze max_group_size: Maximum size for direct comparison groups Returns: Complete IBD relationship graph """ # Phase 1: Cluster individuals into manageable groups groups = cluster_by_genetic_similarity(individuals, max_group_size) # Phase 2: Perform detailed IBD analysis within each group within_group_results = {} for group in groups: within_group_results[group] = analyze_group_ibd(group) # Phase 3: Perform selected cross-group comparisons cross_group_results = analyze_cross_group_connections(groups) # Phase 4: Merge results into a unified relationship graph complete_graph = merge_ibd_results(within_group_results, cross_group_results) return complete_graph
Performance Metrics
Bonsai's performance optimizations yield significant improvements in processing time and memory usage:
- Filtering: Typically reduces computation by 90-99% with minimal accuracy impact
- Chunking: Reduces peak memory usage by 70-80% for large datasets
- Parallelization: Near-linear speedup with processor count for many operations
- Incremental Updates: Can be 10-100x faster than full recomputation
Working with Real Datasets: Case Studies
Learning from Application to Diverse Datasets
Bonsai's development has been informed by application to diverse real-world datasets, each presenting unique challenges and learning opportunities:
Key Dataset Categories
- Founder Populations: Groups with documented founder effects and endogamy
- Admixed Populations: Groups with complex ancestral mixing patterns
- Multi-Generation Pedigrees: Deep family trees with genetic data for multiple generations
- Sparse Coverage Datasets: Pedigrees with genetic data for only a subset of individuals
- Cross-Platform Collections: Data integrated from multiple testing platforms
Case Study: Founder Population Analysis
When applied to a founder population dataset with significant endogamy:
- Challenge: Standard relationship inference overestimated closeness
- Solution: Population-specific endogamy correction factor derived from known relationships
- Result: 78% improvement in relationship degree accuracy
- Lesson: Population-specific calibration is essential for founder populations
Case Study: Multi-Platform Integration
When integrating data from four different testing platforms:
- Challenge: Inconsistent IBD detection across platforms
- Solution: Platform-specific normalization based on known relationships
- Result: Consistent relationship inference regardless of platform
- Lesson: Cross-platform calibration is critical for mixed-source datasets
Key Lessons from Real-World Application
- Accuracy vs. Coverage Tradeoff: Sometimes less data with higher quality yields better results than more data with quality issues
- Contextual Calibration: Parameters should be adjusted based on dataset context (population, platform, etc.)
- Complementary Evidence: Combining genetic evidence with demographic and documentary evidence improves results
- Appropriate Confidence: Confidence reporting should reflect all sources of uncertainty, not just statistical uncertainty
Conclusion and Next Steps
Working with real-world genetic genealogy datasets presents numerous challenges that go beyond theoretical models and ideal conditions. Bonsai v3 addresses these challenges through a combination of robust algorithms, adaptive parameters, population-specific calibration, and careful handling of data quality issues.
By understanding and accounting for data quality issues, population-specific patterns, testing platform differences, privacy considerations, and scale challenges, Bonsai creates more reliable and accurate pedigree reconstructions from real-world data.
In the next lab, we'll explore performance tuning techniques for Bonsai v3, focusing on how to optimize the system for specific application scenarios and computational environments.
Your Learning Pathway
Interactive Lab Environment
Run the interactive Lab 25 notebook in Google Colab:
Google Colab Environment
Run the notebook in Google Colab for a powerful computing environment with access to Google's resources.
Data will be automatically downloaded from S3 when you run the notebook.
Note: You may need a Google account to save your work in Google Drive.
This lab is part of the Visualization & Advanced Applications track:
Rendering
Lab 21
Interpreting
Lab 22
Twins
Lab 23
Complex
Lab 24
Real-World
Lab 25
Performance
Lab 26
Prior Models
Lab 27
Integration
Lab 28
End-to-End
Lab 29
Advanced
Lab 30