Computational Genetic Genealogy

Performance Tuning for Large-Scale Applications

Lab 26: Performance Tuning for Large-Scale Applications

Core Component: This lab explores advanced performance optimization techniques for applying Bonsai v3 to large datasets. Understanding these optimization approaches is essential for efficiently processing the large-scale data encountered in practical genetic genealogy applications.

The Performance Challenge in Genetic Genealogy

Why Performance Matters

Computational genetic genealogy presents significant performance challenges due to several inherent characteristics:

Key Performance Challenges
  • Quadratic Complexity: Many key algorithms have O(n²) complexity or worse, where n is the number of individuals
  • Memory Intensity: Processing genetic data requires substantial memory resources
  • Data Volume: Genetic data sets can be extremely large (gigabytes to terabytes)
  • Optimization Trade-offs: Speed improvements often come at the cost of accuracy or memory usage
  • Interactive Requirements: Many applications require near-real-time response for usability

As genetic testing becomes more widespread, these performance challenges are increasingly important to address. Effective performance tuning enables Bonsai v3 to scale to datasets with thousands or even millions of individuals.

Performance Impact on Usability

Performance is not just a technical concern—it directly affects user experience:

  • Analysis times longer than a few minutes significantly reduce user engagement
  • Memory limitations can prevent processing of large datasets entirely
  • Responsive interfaces require fast underlying algorithms
  • Batch processing needs to complete within reasonable timeframes

Performance Profiling and Bottleneck Identification

Finding the Performance Hotspots

The first step in performance tuning is identifying where the bottlenecks are. Bonsai v3 includes tools and methodologies for comprehensive performance profiling:

Profiling Approaches
  1. Time Profiling: Measuring execution time of different code sections
    • Function-level timing
    • Method invocation counts
    • Critical path analysis
  2. Memory Profiling: Analyzing memory usage patterns
    • Peak memory usage
    • Memory allocation frequency
    • Garbage collection impact
  3. I/O Profiling: Examining data access patterns
    • File read/write operations
    • Database query performance
    • Network communication overheads
Typical Performance Hotspots in Bonsai
Component Typical Bottleneck Impact Level
Pairwise likelihood computation CPU-bound (floating-point operations) Very High
IBD segment analysis Memory-bound (large segment arrays) High
Pedigree structure operations Algorithm complexity (combinatorial operations) High
Data loading and preparation I/O-bound (file operations) Medium
Visualization rendering CPU and memory (complex graph layouts) Medium
The Importance of Realistic Profiling

For effective performance optimization, it's crucial to profile with realistic data and usage patterns:

  • Representative Datasets: Use datasets that match real-world scale and characteristics
  • Typical Workflows: Profile complete workflows, not just isolated functions
  • End-to-End Measurements: Measure performance from the user's perspective, not just internal metrics
  • Environment Matching: Profile in environments similar to production deployment

Algorithmic Optimizations

Improving Asymptotic Efficiency

The most powerful performance improvements come from algorithmic optimizations that reduce the fundamental computational complexity. Bonsai v3 implements several key algorithmic improvements:

Key Algorithmic Strategies
  1. Filtering and Pruning: Eliminating unnecessary computations
    • Early rejection of impossible relationships
    • Pruning search spaces based on constraints
    • Progressive filtering based on quick preliminary checks
  2. Divide and Conquer: Breaking problems into manageable subproblems
    • Hierarchical clustering of individuals
    • Pedigree decomposition into subgraphs
    • Multi-level relationship analysis
  3. Dynamic Programming: Avoiding redundant calculations
    • Memoization of expensive function results
    • Bottom-up computation of subproblems
    • Incremental updates for changing data
Example: Hierarchical Relationship Analysis
# Pseudocode for hierarchical relationship analysis
def analyze_relationships_hierarchical(individuals):
    """
    Analyze relationships using a hierarchical approach.
    
    Args:
        individuals: List of individuals to analyze
        
    Returns:
        Dictionary mapping individual pairs to relationships
    """
    # Phase 1: Cluster individuals into groups likely to be related
    clusters = cluster_by_genetic_similarity(individuals)
    
    # Phase 2: Perform coarse-grained analysis to identify potential relatives
    potential_relatives = {}
    for cluster in clusters:
        coarse_results = analyze_cluster_coarse(cluster)
        potential_relatives.update(coarse_results)
    
    # Phase 3: Perform detailed analysis only on potential relatives
    detailed_relationships = {}
    for pair, relatedness_score in potential_relatives.items():
        if relatedness_score > RELATEDNESS_THRESHOLD:
            detailed_relationships[pair] = analyze_pair_detailed(pair)
    
    return detailed_relationships

This hierarchical approach dramatically reduces computational complexity by eliminating the need to perform detailed analysis on all possible pairs, focusing instead on those most likely to be related.

Algorithm Selection Trade-offs

Choosing the right algorithm involves several key trade-offs:

Trade-off Dimension Options Considerations
Accuracy vs. Speed Exact algorithms vs. approximation algorithms Is absolute accuracy required, or is a good approximation acceptable?
Memory vs. Computation Caching/precomputation vs. recomputation Is memory or CPU the more constrained resource?
Generality vs. Specialization Generic algorithms vs. specialized algorithms Are you optimizing for a specific case or general usage?
Simplicity vs. Efficiency Simple algorithms vs. complex optimized algorithms Is maintainability or raw performance more important?

Memory Optimization Techniques

Efficient Memory Management

Genetic genealogy applications often process large volumes of data, making memory optimization critical. Bonsai v3 implements several approaches to reduce memory usage:

Key Memory Optimization Strategies
  1. Data Structure Selection: Choosing memory-efficient data structures
    • Compact array representations instead of object hierarchies
    • Integer IDs instead of string identifiers
    • Bit vectors for boolean data
  2. Lazy Loading and Streaming: Processing data incrementally
    • Loading data only when needed
    • Processing data in chunks
    • Releasing memory after processing
  3. Caching Strategies: Intelligent memory usage for caching
    • LRU (Least Recently Used) cache eviction
    • Size-based cache limits
    • Selective caching of high-value results
Memory-Efficient IBD Segment Representation

The standard object-oriented representation of IBD segments consumes substantial memory:

# Memory-intensive representation (approximately 136 bytes per segment)
class IBDSegment:
    def __init__(self, chrom, start_pos, end_pos, cm_length, snp_count):
        self.chrom = chrom          # string: ~24 bytes
        self.start_pos = start_pos  # int: 8 bytes
        self.end_pos = end_pos      # int: 8 bytes
        self.cm_length = cm_length  # float: 8 bytes
        self.snp_count = snp_count  # int: 8 bytes
        # Plus object overhead: ~64 bytes
        # Plus various pointers and alignment: ~16 bytes

A more memory-efficient representation might use:

# Memory-efficient representation (approximately 32 bytes per segment)
# Using a tuple: (chrom_id, start_pos, end_pos, cm_length, snp_count)
# Where chrom_id is a small integer (1-22, 23=X, 24=Y)

For a dataset with 10 million segments, this optimization reduces memory usage from 1.3 GB to 300 MB—a significant improvement that can make the difference between a process completing successfully or running out of memory.

Memory Profiling and Monitoring

Effective memory optimization requires understanding memory usage patterns:

  • Peak Memory Usage: Identify the points where memory consumption peaks
  • Object Counts: Track how many instances of each type are created
  • Lifetime Analysis: Understand how long objects remain in memory
  • Allocation Hotspots: Identify code sections with frequent allocations
Memory-Related Failure Modes

Memory issues can manifest in several ways:

  • Out of Memory Errors: Process terminates when memory is exhausted
  • Excessive Garbage Collection: Process slows as GC struggles to free memory
  • Memory Leaks: Memory usage grows continuously until failure
  • Swapping: System performance degrades as data is moved to disk

Effective memory optimization addresses all these failure modes.

Parallel Processing Strategies

Leveraging Multiple Processors

Many genetic genealogy algorithms can benefit from parallel execution. Bonsai v3 implements several parallelization strategies to take advantage of multi-core processors:

Key Parallelization Approaches
  1. Data Parallelism: Processing different data chunks in parallel
    • Dividing individuals into batches
    • Processing different chromosomes in parallel
    • Parallel evaluation of relationship hypotheses
  2. Task Parallelism: Executing different tasks simultaneously
    • Pipeline stages running in parallel
    • Background preprocessing while interactive analysis continues
    • Concurrent I/O and computation
  3. Asynchronous Processing: Non-blocking execution models
    • Asynchronous data loading
    • Callback-based processing
    • Producer-consumer patterns
Parallel Pairwise Likelihood Computation
# Pseudocode for parallelized relationship likelihood computation
def compute_all_pairwise_likelihoods_parallel(individual_pairs, num_workers=8):
    """
    Compute relationship likelihoods for multiple pairs in parallel.
    
    Args:
        individual_pairs: List of (id1, id2) tuples to analyze
        num_workers: Number of parallel workers
        
    Returns:
        Dictionary mapping pairs to relationship likelihoods
    """
    # Create a pool of worker processes
    with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=num_workers) as executor:
        # Submit tasks to the pool
        future_to_pair = {
            executor.submit(compute_pairwise_likelihood, id1, id2): (id1, id2)
            for id1, id2 in individual_pairs
        }
        
        # Collect results as they complete
        results = {}
        for future in as_completed(future_to_pair):
            pair = future_to_pair[future]
            try:
                results[pair] = future.result()
            except Exception as e:
                results[pair] = {"error": str(e)}
    
    return results
Parallelization Challenges

Effective parallelization requires addressing several challenges:

  • Load Balancing: Ensuring work is evenly distributed across workers
  • Synchronization Overhead: Minimizing coordination requirements
  • Resource Contention: Managing shared resource access
  • Data Dependencies: Handling cases where tasks depend on each other's results
Parallel Speedup Potential

The potential speedup from parallelization depends on the algorithm's characteristics:

  • Embarrassingly Parallel: Near-linear speedup with processor count (e.g., pairwise relationship analysis)
  • Partially Parallel: Speedup limited by sequential portions (e.g., pedigree construction with dependencies)
  • I/O-Bound: Limited speedup unless I/O is also parallelized
  • Memory-Bound: Speedup limited by memory bandwidth rather than CPU cores

I/O and Storage Optimizations

Efficient Data Access Patterns

Many genetic genealogy workflows involve substantial data loading and storage operations. Bonsai v3 implements several I/O optimizations to improve overall performance:

Key I/O Optimization Strategies
  1. Data Format Selection: Choosing efficient storage formats
    • Binary formats instead of text formats
    • Column-oriented storage for analytical queries
    • Compressed formats for reduced I/O volume
  2. Access Pattern Optimization: Aligning I/O with usage patterns
    • Sequential reads instead of random access
    • Batched operations instead of single operations
    • Memory mapping for large files
  3. Caching and Prefetching: Anticipating data needs
    • Preloading likely-to-be-needed data
    • Caching frequently accessed data
    • Background loading of data before it's needed
Optimized IBD Segment Storage Format
Format Characteristics Performance Impact
CSV/Text Human-readable, larger size, parsing overhead Slow loading, high storage requirements
Binary Columnar Type-specific encoding, column-oriented, compressed Fast loading, efficient filtering, compact storage
Memory-Mapped Binary Direct memory mapping, native data structures Near-instantaneous loading, pageable access
Database (SQLite/HDF5) Indexed access, query capability, structured format Fast filtered access, slower full scans
Optimizing for Different Storage Media

I/O optimization strategies vary based on the storage medium:

  • HDD (Hard Disk Drive): Minimize seeking, maximize sequential access, large block reads
  • SSD (Solid State Drive): Reduce write amplification, leverage parallelism, smaller reads
  • Network Storage: Minimize round trips, batch operations, consider latency
  • Memory: Optimize locality, reduce allocation overhead, direct memory access

Implementation-Level Optimizations

Low-Level Performance Improvements

Beyond algorithmic and architectural optimizations, Bonsai v3 implements various low-level optimizations to squeeze maximum performance from the underlying hardware:

Key Implementation Optimizations
  1. Vectorization: Using SIMD instructions for parallel data processing
    • Vectorized segment comparisons
    • Parallel floating-point operations
    • Batch processing of genetic data
  2. Memory Layout: Organizing data for efficient access
    • Structure of Arrays (SoA) instead of Array of Structures (AoS)
    • Alignment for cache line optimization
    • Contiguous memory allocation
  3. Computational Shortcuts: Mathematical and logical optimizations
    • Fast approximation functions
    • Lookup tables for expensive calculations
    • Short-circuit evaluation
Vectorized IBD Comparison
# Pseudocode for vectorized IBD segment comparison
def compare_segments_vectorized(segments1, segments2):
    """
    Compare two sets of segments using vectorized operations.
    
    Args:
        segments1: First set of segments as structured numpy array
        segments2: Second set of segments as structured numpy array
        
    Returns:
        Array of overlap measures
    """
    # Extract start and end positions as contiguous arrays
    starts1 = segments1['start_pos']
    ends1 = segments1['end_pos']
    starts2 = segments2['start_pos']
    ends2 = segments2['end_pos']
    
    # Calculate overlap matrix using vectorized operations
    # For each pair of segments (i, j):
    # overlap[i, j] = min(ends1[i], ends2[j]) - max(starts1[i], starts2[j])
    # This performs the whole calculation in parallel using SIMD
    starts1_matrix = starts1[:, np.newaxis]
    ends1_matrix = ends1[:, np.newaxis]
    starts2_matrix = starts2[np.newaxis, :]
    ends2_matrix = ends2[np.newaxis, :]
    
    max_starts = np.maximum(starts1_matrix, starts2_matrix)
    min_ends = np.minimum(ends1_matrix, ends2_matrix)
    overlap = np.maximum(0, min_ends - max_starts)
    
    return overlap

This vectorized implementation can be 10-100x faster than a nested loop approach for large segment sets.

Language and Library Selection

Bonsai v3 strategically uses different languages and libraries for different components based on performance characteristics:

Component Implementation Approach Rationale
Core algorithms Cython/C++ with NumPy integration Maximum computational performance for critical operations
Data structures Optimized Python with typed attributes Balance of performance and maintainability
I/O operations Specialized libraries (HDF5, Arrow) Optimized for specific data formats and access patterns
User interface Pure Python Flexibility and ease of development for non-critical components

Configuration and Tuning for Specific Workloads

Adapting to Different Usage Scenarios

Different genetic genealogy applications have different performance requirements and constraints. Bonsai v3 provides configuration options to tune performance for specific workloads:

Key Configurable Parameters
  • Memory Limits: Controlling maximum memory usage
    • Cache size limits
    • Batch processing thresholds
    • Precomputation settings
  • Parallelism Settings: Configuring parallel execution
    • Worker thread/process count
    • Task prioritization rules
    • Load balancing approaches
  • Algorithm Selection: Choosing between alternative implementations
    • Exact vs. approximate algorithms
    • Memory-optimized vs. speed-optimized variants
    • Specialized algorithms for specific data patterns
Sample Configuration Profiles
Profile Optimized For Key Settings
Interactive Analysis Fast response time, moderate accuracy Use approximation algorithms, limit detail level, prioritize user interface responsiveness
Batch Processing High throughput, efficient resource usage Maximize parallelism, use streaming processing, optimize for throughput over latency
High Accuracy Maximum precision, thorough analysis Use exact algorithms, detailed examination of all evidence, comprehensive validation
Low Memory Operation with constrained resources Minimize memory usage, process in small chunks, use disk-based storage for intermediate results
Dynamic Configuration Adjustment

Bonsai v3 can dynamically adjust its configuration based on runtime conditions:

  • Workload Adaptation: Adjusting parameters based on dataset characteristics
  • Resource Sensing: Modifying behavior based on available system resources
  • Performance Monitoring: Changing strategies based on observed performance
  • User Priority: Adjusting optimization targets based on user preferences

Conclusion and Next Steps

Performance tuning is a critical aspect of computational genetic genealogy, enabling the processing of large-scale datasets within reasonable time and resource constraints. Bonsai v3 implements a comprehensive set of performance optimizations, from high-level algorithmic improvements to low-level implementation details, providing efficient operation across a wide range of usage scenarios.

By understanding and applying these performance optimization techniques, you can adapt Bonsai v3 to your specific needs, whether you're analyzing small family groups interactively or processing large populations in batch mode.

In the next lab, we'll explore custom prior probability models in Bonsai v3, which allow for incorporating demographic information and domain-specific knowledge to enhance the accuracy of relationship predictions.

Interactive Lab Environment

Run the interactive Lab 26 notebook in Google Colab:

Google Colab Environment

Run the notebook in Google Colab for a powerful computing environment with access to Google's resources.

Data will be automatically downloaded from S3 when you run the notebook.

Note: You may need a Google account to save your work in Google Drive.

Open Lab 26 Notebook in Google Colab

This lab is part of the Visualization & Advanced Applications track:

Rendering

Lab 21

Interpreting

Lab 22

Twins

Lab 23

Complex

Lab 24

Real-World

Lab 25

Performance

Lab 26

Prior Models

Lab 27

Integration

Lab 28

End-to-End

Lab 29

Advanced

Lab 30